User talk:DavidCary

From OpenCircuits
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(spammers)
m (spammers)
Line 35: Line 35:
 
::::--SebDE
 
::::--SebDE
 
:::::Well I just digged through the code of the Extension and spotted a spam filter option that is already there in the MediaWiki software. It would involve edititing the configuration for any new spam pattern, tough. --SebDE
 
:::::Well I just digged through the code of the Extension and spotted a spam filter option that is already there in the MediaWiki software. It would involve edititing the configuration for any new spam pattern, tough. --SebDE
 +
 +
'''Anonymous Edits?'''
 +
Aloha from Honolulu David,
 +
I just got an email saying my page had been edited by an anonymous user.  I don't know who this is, ther is nothing his/her page.  I would not be complainig if the edits had improved things, but all they did was delete information.  Perhaps it is their sense of humor.
 +
I am glad there is the record of changes made, so I can try to recover what was removed.  Just to let you know that apparently spammers are not all you have to worry about.
 +
 +
Roger
 +
[[User:RogerAF|RAF]] 05:58, 9 July 2007 (PDT)

Revision as of 04:58, 9 July 2007

Why don't you help finish my programmable chip eeg project and then use what you learned and the results to then create your own project. Programmers like to reuse working modulas instead of reinventing the wheel.



spammers

I think I know how to dramatically reduce the amount of linkspam on the website i think if the administrators on this site protect pages that are frequently spammed such as Open Circuits talk:Community Portal that will reduce the amount of spam on this site because the spammers will not be able to edit those pages.--71.234.233.163 08:21, 2 June 2007 (PDT)

I just signed up a few minutes ago and noticed that there seems to be a lot of linkspam being placed by unregistered users. I don't want to exclude folk, but would only allowing registered users to edit cut down some of the spam? Autarch 09:53, 13 June 2007 (PDT)
You are right.
Certainly that is one way to cut down on spam, and perhaps I will be forced to do that soon.

Another way, as you can see from Special:Ipblocklist, I've been banning a bunch of anonymous spammers.

But is there another, better way to reduce spam?
I want to avoid a problem I am starting to notice.
Sometimes I see a tiny little typo or technopropisms or some other tiny little thing that I could easily fix
( http://communitywiki.org/WhyWikiWorks ).
But someone has built a huge barrier that prevents me from helping.
We want a system in a way that makes it very easy for anyone to help us.
Certainly too much spam is leaking through just now, but I don't want to go to the opposite extreme and make people go through a big complicated procedure in order to improve a schematic or fix a typo.
--DavidCary 21:39, 21 June 2007 (PDT)
That's a very noble way of thinking. I also like to be able to edit anonymously... There are enough sites you have to register for already. --SebDE
I know how to greatly reducethe amount of spam without stopping anomyomus ips from editing you can install a spam filter like the one at my website EvoWiki we usually dont get much spam at EvoWiki because we have a spam filter.--71.234.233.163 15:01, 22 June 2007 (PDT)
Indeed, a black list based on words is the way to go here. BTW this seems to be an extension you need to install from there
And an easy way to monitor for spam can help, too. The spam cops around here might want to check out those wiki editing tools ;) --SebDE
Bummer, they recently moved the BalckList Extension to the Extension namespace http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SpamBlacklist
Anyways, if you've problem with installing that or in doubt of maintaining - I run several mediawikis for private use and am quite advanced with regexes, although only very simple ones are needed for the BlackList.
--SebDE
Well I just digged through the code of the Extension and spotted a spam filter option that is already there in the MediaWiki software. It would involve edititing the configuration for any new spam pattern, tough. --SebDE

Anonymous Edits? Aloha from Honolulu David, I just got an email saying my page had been edited by an anonymous user. I don't know who this is, ther is nothing his/her page. I would not be complainig if the edits had improved things, but all they did was delete information. Perhaps it is their sense of humor. I am glad there is the record of changes made, so I can try to recover what was removed. Just to let you know that apparently spammers are not all you have to worry about.

Roger RAF 05:58, 9 July 2007 (PDT)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox