Difference between revisions of "Talk:Better for the environment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I don't understand.) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 14:50, 23 April 2008
I don't understand the point of statements like "The embodied energy in a Monocrystalline solar panel, ... seems rather high". High compared to what? Is there a better alternative? --DavidCary 15:50, 23 April 2008 (PDT)
